Abortion Was Just the Beginning
I don't remember how I ran across the blog "Abortion Clinic Days," written by women who are counselors at a clinic that performs abortions. Certainly these women have an agenda: this is their chosen profession, so their views on the issue are quite clear. But by telling the stories of some of the women they have met, they defy the stereotyping of the women who seek their clinic's services.
A couple of recent posts there have addressed the spiritual and religious dimensions of these women, like this one:
This is the thing about abortion. Those who would outlaw it don't always address the realities of what makes women seek abortions (and I could go on at length about that, but I won't); there-oughta-be-a-law changes the legalities without changing the reality--you have to provide the infrastructure to support an alternative decision if you want to end abortions. (Perhaps the gentlemen of Boring Diatribe will weigh in with discussion of the Pro-Good agenda.) Moreover, calling the women having abortions baby-killers does little to recognize the circumstances that brought them to that place. At the same time, the knee-jerk abortion-is-a-right reaction of some on the opposite side is at risk of ignoring the complexity involved particularly for anyone whose faith does lead them to believe that their fetus is something more than a lump of tissue. Making abortion an undeniable right doesn't do anything either to address the issues that put women in the position of making a difficult choice, nor help them address the spiritual consequences of that choice.
I'm not saying anything new here, or anything that hasn't been said before--it's been the story of the abortion debate from the outset.
The devolution of political discourse overall in the U.S. was in many ways presaged by the abortion debate: one side claims absolutes and says they have the authority of God; the other side claims absolutes and denies any role for God. Where is the place for all the rest of us?
A couple of recent posts there have addressed the spiritual and religious dimensions of these women, like this one:
what she wanted was not closure between her and god which she felt she was on her way to finding, but rather that her pregnancy be sent to god. i told her that she could view her tissue and say whatever prayers over it that she chose, but she said no that was not what she needed. she then asked me if i would baptize the baby and i agreed to. another staff person and i went to a private room, turned down the lights, then said the prayers together.Then there's this one, a woman who is struggling to feed the children she has:
she wonders if she will go to hell for choosing abortion, but said she would risk going to hell after her death rather than put her children at risk now.I ask those in her church: would you really damn a woman for making that choice?
This is the thing about abortion. Those who would outlaw it don't always address the realities of what makes women seek abortions (and I could go on at length about that, but I won't); there-oughta-be-a-law changes the legalities without changing the reality--you have to provide the infrastructure to support an alternative decision if you want to end abortions. (Perhaps the gentlemen of Boring Diatribe will weigh in with discussion of the Pro-Good agenda.) Moreover, calling the women having abortions baby-killers does little to recognize the circumstances that brought them to that place. At the same time, the knee-jerk abortion-is-a-right reaction of some on the opposite side is at risk of ignoring the complexity involved particularly for anyone whose faith does lead them to believe that their fetus is something more than a lump of tissue. Making abortion an undeniable right doesn't do anything either to address the issues that put women in the position of making a difficult choice, nor help them address the spiritual consequences of that choice.
I'm not saying anything new here, or anything that hasn't been said before--it's been the story of the abortion debate from the outset.
The devolution of political discourse overall in the U.S. was in many ways presaged by the abortion debate: one side claims absolutes and says they have the authority of God; the other side claims absolutes and denies any role for God. Where is the place for all the rest of us?
4 Comments:
You've pretty much summed up my feelings about the complexity of this issue. One side acts as if the other doesn't matter, and the other acts as if the child doesn't matter. I favor legalized abortions for all kinds of reasons (although I'm not at all sure I could have one myself), but the "it's the woman's body" rhetoric makes me a little crazy. If you're pregnant, you're sharing your body with someone else. That's why this issue is so incredibly painful and complicated.
Joanna Russ has written a terrific essay called "Pornography and the Doubleness of Sex for Woman" (in her collection MAGIC MOMMAS, TREMBLING SISTERS, PURITANS AND PERVERTS). She's talking about the complexity of the porn debates and how both sides talk right past each other because they're talking about different things, but the model she uses works well for any complicated cultural debate. That essay really helped me understand how the dynamics of this kind of controversy work.
It's no help solving the problems, though.
i favor legalized abortion as well. It's interesting too that the Catholic church recommended abortion as a method of managing family size well into the Victorian era. (Would have to look it up to learn when that changed; I used to know but have long since forgotten.) Nothing is absolute.
Coincidentally, I TiVO'd the film Vera Drake recently and just watched it yesterday. Interesting portrait of a woman whom we see at the outset is motivated in everything she does to help people in her community . . . and that includes "helping girls who've got in trouble." There's a brief side story of a the daughter of one of the women Vera cleans house for; the girl is raped by her boyfriend and becomes pregnant. From a narrative viewpoint, one expects she will find herself seeking Vera's services--but she doesn't. She has the financial resources to have her abortion performed in hospital by trained medical staff who treat her without stigma. Except to the extent that we've seen her in the house when Vera is cleaning so we know who she is, their stories never intersect.
I think that's important: there is, as with so many other issues as well, an economic component that is easily ignored by those with easy answers. The decision is no less difficult for a woman of means--but the ability to act on her decision, whatever it may be, is much less complicated when there is money.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
TOTALLY DUDE!!!!!!!!!!! ABORTIONS ROCKS I GET THEM EVERYTIME IM PREGNANT!!!!!!! FU*K THEM EGGS I PUT A HANGER UP MY VAGINA TO KILL THE EGG!!!! YEA DUDE!!!!
Post a Comment
<< Home